X

Join or Sign In

Sign in to customize your TV listings

Continue with Facebook Continue with email

By joining TV Guide, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy.

Antony and Cleopatra Reviews

Reviewed By: Mike Cummings

Superb acting marks this 1974 Royal Shakespeare Company production of Antony and Cleopatra. However, viewers expecting a Hollwood-style epic, à la the 1963 Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor extravaganza Cleopatra, may balk at the spare sets and meager musical interludes. In most of the scenes, there is no backdrop other than a monochromatic haze ranging from white to black. What's more, there is no musical score as such except for occasional simple tunes and drum rolls. Nevertheless, the film succeeds, mainly because the acting has bite and pith. As Mark Antony, Richard Johnson infuses his character with flawed nobility. Janet Suzman is quite convincing as history's most magnificent minx -- she is sensuous and tempestuous. Her makeup artist, however, deserves a slap on the wrist for painting her face with an "instant tan" that stands out noticeably. Performances by supporting actors -- in particular, Patrick Stewart and Corin Redgrave -- are excellent. Stewart brings humor, warmth, and pathos to his role as Antony's friend and right-hand man, Enobarbus. As Octavius, Redgrave is appropriately haughty and cold, speaking envenomed words that foreshadow his eventual clash with Antony. Others who perform with distinction include Derek Godfrey as Macenas and Philip Locke as the diplomatic Agrippa. But was director Jon Scoffield right in staging this production without the pomp and circumstance of lavish sets and trumpet fanfares? Shakespeare purists would no doubt answer yes. Unfortunately, in an age of dazzling spectacle and special effects, it hasn't attracted many viewers.