Join or Sign In
Sign in to customize your TV listings
By joining TV Guide, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy.
Everyone's a loser in the case of Rosie vs. Rosie. A judge ruled Wednesday that neither Rosie O'Donnell nor the publisher of her doomed mag deserve damages in their dispute over its collapse. "It seems to me... we're just dealing with bragging rights here, who wins and who loses," said New York state Supreme Court Justice Ira Gammerman. Despite the split decision, O'Donnell could still ask Gruner + Jahr to cover her legal expenses. "I'm happy it's over," the former talk show host said outside court. She then used the opportunity to plug her new Broadway show Taboo, which opens tomorrow. She's no dummy.
Everyone's a loser in the case of Rosie vs. Rosie. A judge ruled Wednesday that neither Rosie O'Donnell nor the publisher of her doomed mag deserve damages in their dispute over its collapse. "It seems to me... we're just dealing with bragging rights here, who wins and who loses," said New York state Supreme Court Justice Ira Gammerman. Despite the split decision, O'Donnell could still ask Gruner + Jahr to cover her legal expenses. "I'm happy it's over," the former talk show host said outside court. She then used the opportunity to plug her new Broadway show Taboo, which opens tomorrow. She's no dummy.